tbreath78
star
Reged: 11/23/09
Posts: 432
|
|
I love the character of Nora, but you are right, it's not the same without Lindsey. Those two women had a chemistry that has gone unmatched with any other duo on daytime...in my opinion. I loved that line too, "What are you going to do without me." And you are right, she has done absolutely nothing....well, nothing that was that interesting. If TPTB over at OLTL have any sense, they will call Katherine Hickland up and beg her to reprise the role of Lindsey. The show is good, but it hasn't been the same without Lindsey. Just like I feel like killing off Stacy might have been a little premature, especially since she became more human towards the end. I've said it a thousand times....Stacy was the younger version of Lindsey. And we all could have went for years with her and Gigi going at it......just like we love to watch Nora & Lindsey go toe to toe.
|
fluffyboy
heartthrob
Reged: 02/04/10
Posts: 306
Loc: houston, tx
|
|
Okay...they waited almost a year to get rid of Stacy and when they do, it turns out to be premature. She had started to grow on the audience. I liked that they had a young vixen on the show. Every show needs one. They haven't had a good one since Tina first came on the scene. Jen was close but after giving her fangs, she was reverted back to her former toothless self. Adriana almost fit the bill but her schemes were only affecting Rex and Gigi, whereas Tina's schemes affected the whole canvas. Stacy could have been that kind of character. I can see it now, after failing to land Rex, she sets her sights on a returned Joey so that she can be able to give her daughter the best that life has to offer, thus getting the whole Buchanan clan in a tizzy. And Viki rolling her eyes, trying not to judge, and then setting up a fantastic rivalry with Natalie, who is another one of those characters that needs a foil because she just isn't interesting without one. They could have been a younger version of Lindsey and Nora, except Stacy showed way more self-esteem than Lindsey could muster on a good day. 
|
tbreath78
star
Reged: 11/23/09
Posts: 432
|
|
Yeah, but where Lindsey lacked in self esteem, she more than made up for with her deliciously evil schemes. She will always be my favorite vixen in daytime tv.
|
destiny8910
back from the dead
Reged: 01/04/09
Posts: 3839
|
|
Quote:
Yeah, I'm not getting the connection between these two at all. I mean, why is Ford so interested in getting on with a girl who is still in high school? Kind of gross if you ask me. I know she's in her Senior year, but she's still 17....Ford needs to go to jail. But honestly, I am tired of Marco and his needy nature. It's funny how when they first became a couple Langston was all about them having sex and Marco was more reserved about it. Now, Marco is crawling all over Langston and she keeps pushing him away. These two have never sparked that much of an interest for me. It was much more interesting when they had Langston's crazy cousin trying to come between the two of them. Now, it's just total yawnsville.
I'm thinking that Ford is one of Mitch Lawrence's followers. The problems is that he is actually falling for Langston. I kind of picked that up when they were showing the Cramer women in possible danger; Adriana and Kelly and the whole stranger in Paris thing, Cassie at home with the tea; then they would flash to Langston and Ford in his office. That was gave me the idea of him being one of Mitch's followers. jmo
As for Langston, I really like her. Even though she hasn't really had any major storylines, she makes for a good filler. And she can kick some azz. I like her feistiness (sp) and her mouthiness 
|
fluffyboy
heartthrob
Reged: 02/04/10
Posts: 306
Loc: houston, tx
|
|
Well, everyone should know how happy I was to see that it was not Cassie who dies. I almost started crying, but I will admit, I felt for Kelly. On a different note, Langston has finally earned her Skank card. I hated that she cheated on Markko with someone she has no emotional connection with. That was purely sexual.
|
tbreath78
star
Reged: 11/23/09
Posts: 432
|
|
Yeah, I'm glad it wasn't Cassie too. And I totally agree with you, Langston gets the Skank Of The Year Award. There was absolutely no reason for her to jump in the sack with Ford...just pure skankiness. If Ford does work for Mitch, I'm not getting the angle. It's not like Langston's a virgin, and they used protection....I just think this is a story that they are trying to throw together for Langston and Marco...too bad I'm not interested.
|
fluffyboy
heartthrob
Reged: 02/04/10
Posts: 306
Loc: houston, tx
|
|
While watching today's episode, and seeing how happy Ford was for nailing that skeezer Langston, I was trying to figure out, what is Ford trying to do? Then, after watching him with Markko, I said, who cares? It seems the writers don't know either and that they are making things up as they go. However, after saying that I was so over Mitch, I found myself caring again because of his scenes with Roxie. I'm intrigued and I want to know What is the deal with those two? I remember Roxie telling Kyle she had one more big secret she was keeping from Rex. I hope they don't drag it out for years like they did his paternity or I will stop caring again.
|
fluffyboy
heartthrob
Reged: 02/04/10
Posts: 306
Loc: houston, tx
|
|
Oh my God!! PLEASE don't let Kelly and Todd hook up. People are forgetting that it is Todd's fault that Kelly's fiance Ian Armitage was killed because he was trying to frame Patrick Thornhart.
|
fluffyboy
heartthrob
Reged: 02/04/10
Posts: 306
Loc: houston, tx
|
|
However, it does fall in line with history because Cassie used to work for Todd also as a reporter.
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Re: Cramer Women
[Re: 
Edit
Reply
Quote
